Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 113:1

הא נמי אכלה ממאי דלמא עד כאן לא קאמרי רבי אלעזר ורבי שמעון התם אלא דיש לו להאכיל במקום אחר אבל הכא דאין לו להאכיל במקום אחר לא

this woman also may eat.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since through the kinyan of the betrothal the woman becomes the priest's acquisition and is, therefore, like himself, entitled to eat terumah so long as she does not become profaned (a halalah) through actual marriage. ');">¹</span> Whence [is this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The ruling according to R. Eleazar and R. Simeon just deduced. ');">²</span> proved]? Is it not possible that R. Eleazar and R. Simeon maintain [their opinion] only there because in other circumstances<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he married a woman permitted to him. ');">³</span> he is entitled to confer the right of eating, but not here where he is never entitled to confer the right of eating!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he is not permitted to marry any woman. ');">⁴</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 113:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.